I read this and thought I really couldn't say it any better.
And now, the end is near
And so I face the final curtain
My friend, I'll say it clear
I'll state my case, of which I'm certain
I've lived a life that's full
I traveled each and every highway
And more, much more than this
I did it my way
Regrets, I've had a few
But then again, too few to mention
I did what I had to do
And saw it through without exemption
I planned each charted course
Each careful step along the byway
And more, much more than this
I did it my way
Yes, there were times, I'm sure you knew
When I bit off more than I could chew
But through it all, when there was doubt
I ate it up and spit it out
I faced it all and I stood tall
And did it my way
I've loved, I've laughed and cried
I've had my fill, my share of losing
And now, as tears subside
I find it all so amusing to think I did all that
And may I say, not in a shy way
Oh, no, oh, no, not me, I did it my way
For what is a man, (or woman - I added this bit) what has he (she - and this bit) got?
If not himself, (herself - you've got the idea) then (s)he has not
To say the things (s)he truly feels
And not the words of one who kneels
The record shows I took the blows
And did it my way
Yes, it was my way
Thank you to everyone on the course for making me feel welcome - as a direct entry to Year 2 you made it easy for me to fit in. Thank you to all the tutors but especially Caroline (who has helped me through the terrible APEL thing) and Simon (who has had to put up with me waffeling my way through two Modules).
Onwards and upwards xxxx
[ Lyrics from: http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/f/frank_sinatra/i_did_it_my_way.html ]
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Sunday, 29 April 2012
A good day
I had a good day with the students on Friday. They have to complete a Proposal Proforma for their Final Major Project (FMP) which constitutes Unit 7 of the course. I felt that I was really able to assist the students with this as I helped them to clarify and refine their ideas. I was also able to help them express these in written form and making sure spelling and grammar was accurate. I was able to pull together my experience as a designer and a learning support tutor so I felt confident that the feedback I gave the students was accurate and appropriate.
The approach the tutors have taken with regards to learning outcomes, unit criteria and grading has been good so helped with the process. From the moment the FMP was presented to the students the criteria, learning outcomes and grading descriptors were printed out and made available to the students. This is consistent with the approach that has been taken throughout the course on project work. The students have always been told what is expected from them. In this way the students have time to assimilate the language and plan their approach; whether all the students take advantage of this is another question.
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Extended Professional Role
I'm now back to work and studying after a long break and I feel a bit scared. Not about the unit as the tutor, Mark Flagg, has made what could be a dry and boring topic interesting and relevant to my teaching practice. He's quite funny as well so at least we had a laugh. I am however worried about getting all the assignments completed on time. I haven't slacked off on the course but I still have loads to do. I'll just have to be completely boring and attach myself to my laptop on my dining room table surrounded by bits of paper. My only consolation is that I'm not the only one who feels a bit daunted by the end date.
I think this will be a really interested unit as I can see how management theory can easily apply to my role as a tutor; and my future. I have loads more reading to do but at least I am looking forward to it.......... however, ask me again in a few weeks and this may have changed.
Over and out for now.
I think this will be a really interested unit as I can see how management theory can easily apply to my role as a tutor; and my future. I have loads more reading to do but at least I am looking forward to it.......... however, ask me again in a few weeks and this may have changed.
Over and out for now.
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Context of Post Compulsory Education and Training Assignment
At
the moment I feel that I have made quite a good start on the ‘Context of Post
Compulsory Education’ assignment. I had
a really nice discussion with Bella Kerr, the course director on the Foundation
Course, a few days ago about the topic of the assignment as I thought that it
was important to get some input from established staff so I could complete a
study which would be useful. We
discussed a number of issues around assessing and grading learner’s art work
and the impact this may have on learners.
We also discussed some of the difficulties around assessing and marking
project work and the value of the learners development work. It reminded me of something I read about the
role studio-critiques have as both a learning process and assessment tool (I can’t
think where I read this but I’ll have to do some research to find it). This really helped me to clarify my ideas
around the assignment and has given me the confidence to move forward.
However,
I have haven’t had to complete this type of research assignment before so I am
not 100% sure on the approach I should take.
I have some idea of the questions I should use on the student
questionnaire and some idea of where I can get some previous research but apart
from that I don’t really know the best approach I should take. Can anyone out there give me some tips on the
best way to go about completing this research assignment?
Friday, 9 March 2012
Motivation - who needs it?
Learners
on the course have now been given their Final Major Project and I have to say
they are freaking out a bit. The title
is ‘Power of Making’ but that is all the guidance they have been given. On previous projects the students have been
given a project brief which gave indications of the direction the project
should take and some idea of timescales. I think some learners were shocked
about the open nature of their Final Major Project and at this point don’t know
what direction to take.
At this point on the course learner resilience and motivation really comes into play which I started me thinking about where motivation comes from. Does it only come from within? Is it something that can be learnt? Can other people give you motivation? So I started reading into ideas around motivation - which has also come in handy for Simon’s research assignment. I found out that there are two forms of motivation; intrinsic and extrinsic. ‘Intrinsic motivation is said to come from an inner drive and is related to the human need for self-esteem and self-confidence and a desire to satisfy curiosity……. Extrinsic motivation on the other hand is externally produced’ (Armitage et al, 2007: 68).
At this point on the course learner resilience and motivation really comes into play which I started me thinking about where motivation comes from. Does it only come from within? Is it something that can be learnt? Can other people give you motivation? So I started reading into ideas around motivation - which has also come in handy for Simon’s research assignment. I found out that there are two forms of motivation; intrinsic and extrinsic. ‘Intrinsic motivation is said to come from an inner drive and is related to the human need for self-esteem and self-confidence and a desire to satisfy curiosity……. Extrinsic motivation on the other hand is externally produced’ (Armitage et al, 2007: 68).
As
I continued my research motivation, and learner resilience, seemed to be
closely linked with issues of self-efficacy which were developed by psychologist
Albert Bandura’s (1995) in his social cognitive theory. Bandura’s theory emphasised the role of
observational learning and social experience has in the development of individual
character or personality traits. This
consisted of an individual’s attitudes, abilities and cognitive skills; this is
what Bandura called the self-system. This has a major impact in how individuals
perceive different situations and how they respond to those situations. Therefore self-efficacy is ‘the belief in
one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage
prospective situations’ (Bandura, 1995: 2).
So, in simple
terms self-efficacy is an individual’s belief in their ability to be successful
in a particular situation. Therefore
individuals with a high level of self-efficacy see challenging problems as
tasks to be overcome, engage more actively in the activities in which they
participate and recover more quickly from setbacks or problems. On the other hand, individuals with low
levels of self-efficacy avoid difficult tasks and situations, focus on their weakness
and negative outcomes and lose confidence quickly if they experience a negative
outcome.
But
what does this mean to the learners on Foundation Diploma course and their
final major project. Those learners who have a high level of intrinsic motivation
and self-efficacy will probably embrace this stage of the course and deal with
the challenges. Those learners who have
lower levels of intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy will probably need more
support. ‘For extrinsic motivation to be
sustained, students must have attainable goals to work towards, be given
immediate feedback on their performance and be rewarded for success’ (Armitage
et al, 2007: 68).
There
is, however, a further issue that needs to be considered. Due to the nature of this course learners
need to show a level of self-directed study and explore their own creativity
and visual literacy skills. It would
therefore be unethical to offer too much support to some learners, especially
if you consider the purpose of the course which, in the main, is to prepare
learners for higher education. I would
argue that learners need to receive the support that is appropriate for them to
achieve. so each one is able to achieve their potential.
References
Armitage, A., Byant, R.,
Dunnill, R., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Kent, J., Lawes, S. & Renwick, M.
(2007) Teaching and Training in Post-Compulsory Education, 3rd Ed, Maidenhead:
Open University Press.
Bandura,
A. (1995) Self-Efficacy in Changing
Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bibliography
Bandura,
A. (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a
unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Sunday, 26 February 2012
To be entrepreurial or not to be entrepreneurial?
I
seem to continue to have issues with this unit.
My understanding of this unit was that it was about being
entrepreneurial, in other words creative and innovative, within teaching but
was not about teaching enterprise.
Obviously, there are links between the two. ‘Both entrepreneurship and
learning are behavioural and social processes, so they are not just about
‘knowing’ but also acting, and are not simply individual, but constantly
involve interaction with other people as an inescapable part of the learning
process’ (Rae, 2008: 40-41). I have
enjoyed listening to the guest speakers but the emphasis from all of them has been, in my opinion, is a traditional view of enterprise as a
business activity. I am struggling to
sit and listen because I think the information I am getting doesn’t really help
me with knowing what to put into my pitch and then my assignment.
I can see the appeal of Enterprise
Projects and Enterprise activities.
Television programmes like Dragons’ Den and The Apprentice have brought
a heightened awareness to lots of people about what it means to be ‘entrepreneurial’. They therefore provide a helpful starting
point for students as ‘successful participants go through a process of
auditioning, presenting and pitching, honing their skills through criticism and
turning themselves into a brand...These programmes are all about
self-improvement and risk-taking in a creative and entrepreneurial economy’
(DCMS, 2006 :23). As educators we also
recognise the value of the transferable skills students can develop, such as
teamwork, problem solving, initiative, creativity, independence and
resilience. However, it’s just not what
the pitch or the assignment is about.
References
Department for Culture, Media and
Sport (2006) Nurturing Creativity in
Young People, London: DCMS.
Rae, D. (2008) Entrepreneurship: from opportunity to
action, 2nd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
My first observation - yeah
I
had my first observed session today - I was really pleased with how it
went. I think I was lucky that I had a
really good group of students who engaged well and worked together effectively. The activities I had planned worked well as
the learners were able to learn for themselves instead of me just spoon feeding
them the information. I think that this
is the best way to learn. If I think
back to school and university the things that I remember were connected to
personal experiences and when I had some input in my own learning. ‘The key to effective, long-term is based
upon experiential learning which has the following features: personal
involvement, stimulation of feelings and thinking, self-initiation and self-evaluation…..
Active learning by doing is seen as the key, but some form of reflection through
evaluation is essential’ (Reece and Walker, 2007: 87).
In
my past position I had, what I considered, unfair observations form my manager
who had very little positive things to say about my teaching. I feel I am willing to listen to constructive
criticism as I do want to continually improve but I don’t respond well if I
think comments are not valid or fair. As
a result I have built up a bit of a barrier in my own mind about observations. On the positive side it has made me aware of
the importance of treating students fairly and giving good quality
feedback. This prompted me to do a bit
of research into feedback and I came across the research carried out by John Hattie
(2009) who was interested in determining exactly what has the greatest
influence on student learning. ‘Hattie
shows that feedback has more impact on learning than any other general factor,
but it requires an activity and a product’ (Petty, 2009: 85). I think this is really important. I do think about the feedback I give
learners, especially as this is an art and design course where continuous
dialogue is an intrinsic element of improving students art and design practice,
but reading this information has made me consider it in more depth.
References
Petty, G. (2009) Evidence-Based Teaching; A Practical Approach, 2nd edition,
Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Reece, I. and Walker. S (2007) Teaching, Training and Learning; A Practical
Guide, 6th edition, Tyne and Wear: Business Education Publishers Ltd.
Saturday, 18 February 2012
On 'PAR' ..........sorry about the bad joke
Not
that I think anybody needs it, but I wanted to share a teaching model that
really works for me when I am planning a session. This is the PAR model (look on page 171 of Geoff
Petty, 2009: Evidence-Based Teaching) where P stands for Present, A stands for
Apply and R stands for Review. This
model also suggests that about 35% of the time should be spent on presenting
information, about 60% of the time should be spent of applying knowledge in
activities and tasks and about 5% of the time should be spent on reviewing the
session. I find it easier to use than
Klob’s Learning Cycle (sorry Klob) as the terminology is easier to understand
and therefore access. When you plan a
session you have so much to think about (making sure there are a range of
teaching strategies, LLUK standards are incorporated, all learning styles are
considered and different abilities are taken account of) that it is nice to
have something easy to follow.
Hope
it helps – let me know.
Thursday, 9 February 2012
Entrpreneurial Educators - The Pitch!
Well
done everyone. I don’t know about you
but I found last night’s class pretty full on and quite demanding.
Everyone
worked hard but I especially enjoyed the pitches from Dawn, Andy and Nia. I thought they had really thought about how
they could improve their current teaching practice. I was impressed that Dawn had identified how
she really improve the learning experience of her learners and how they could
apply what they had learnt to make a difference in their real lives. She had even gone a step further by talking
to the prison governor so that her ideas could be applied rather than just
being an activity she planned in order to fulfil the needs of an
assignment. Andy, again, had really
thought about the needs of his learners and how he could meet these needs in a
creative and interesting way. This
showed that he had a great deal of understanding and respect for his subject
and his learners. The pitch was clear,
concise and thought provoking but was delivered with a good sense of fun so it
was enjoyable to listen to. Nia showed,
in my opinion anyway, that she had understood the brief and delivered exactly
what was required. She gave real life
practical examples of how she could improve her current practices and make them
more relevant, creative and innovative.
Saturday, 14 January 2012
Group Dynamics ..... um interesting
This
was the first week of the Entrepreneurial Educators module. There was a lot going on in this session as
there were a number of guest speakers, as well as a lot of new learners, in
this session. Clearly, there is a lot of
interest in this module from the Welsh Assembly.
I
like to see myself as a friendly and welcoming person but I did find it a bit
strange having new members of the class.
It made me think about the psychologist Bruce Tuckman (1965) who
developed the memorable phrase "forming, storming, norming and
performing" as a model of group development. He used it to describe how high-performing
teams work together. He later added a fifth stage which he called "adjourning",
which is also known as "mourning".
I
had a vague awareness of this model but this session has prompted me to learn
more about it. I’ve looked on the
internet and in some text books and found it quite interesting. It then started me thinking about groups I
have worked in and the theory did, in the main, apply in practice. However, like any model it doesn’t apply to
all groups as group dynamics can vary so much; according to both the purpose of
the group and the nature of the individuals within the group. I have been in groups where the “forming”,
“storming” and “norming” happened very quickly as everyone got on well and had
the same priorities. This meant that the
group spent most of the time “performing”, so I would say it was an effective
group. On the other hand I have been in
groups where the “performing” stage never really happened as there was too much
conflict within the group.
I
enjoyed some aspects of the class but did find it quite hard and
demanding. I don’t know whether this
was because it was a completely new module and was not what I expected or
because there were new learners which changed the group dynamics or because the
session was a bit disjointed with lots of teaching staff.
Bibliography
Armitage, A., Byant, R.,
Dunnill, R., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Kent, J., Lawes, S. & Renwick, M.
(2007) Teaching and Training in
Post-Compulsory Education, 3rd Ed, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Smith, M. K. (2005) Bruce W. Tuckman - forming, storming,
norming and performing in groups, The encyclopaedia of informal education, www.infed.org/thinkers/tuckman.htm.
[Accessed 12th January 2012].
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)